NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 01/15 JOHN STREET 1001217, 79/14
Document / 1 page

Asbestos Analysis Report for Roof and Window Ledge Samples, 15

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Laboratory report detailing the microscopic analysis of bulk samples collected from the westside roof and window ledges.

NYC-WTC_000094264

Folder label: “15 JOHN STREET 1001217, 79/14”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000094264
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORT ASBESTOS CONTROL PROGRAM LABORATORY 96-05 HORACE HARDING EXPRESSWAY CORONA, NEW YORK 11368 (718) 595-6309 FAX# (718)595-6307 ELAP # 11045 A TEST METHODS: 1) 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart F, App. Method -Counting 2) Polarized Light Microscopy plus Stratified Point 3) EPA/600/R-93/116

Incident #: WTC071302 Date Collected: 07/13/02 Inspector : C. LUTCHMEDIAL Received: 07/13/02 Premise 15 JOHN STREET Analyzed: 07/13/02 Boro Manhattan Analyst E. BRUTUS

Client #:

DEP Sample #: 20713/A058004 20713/A058005 20713/A058006

Laboratory #: 20713/641 20713/642 20713/643

Location Sampled: WESTSIDE ROOF WINDOW LEDGE WINDWOW LEDGE

Color: BEIGE BEIGE BEIGE

Homogenous: Yes Yes Yes Asbestos Present: Yes Yes Yes

Results (%)

Chrysotile 1 Chrysotile TRACE Chrysotile 1.1 Amosite TRACE Cellulose 10 Amosite TRACE Cellulose 2 Fibrous glass30 Cellulose 5 Fibrous glass25 Matrix 60 Fibrous glass25 Matrix 72 Matrix 68.9

Comments:

Reviewed by: a1L ^s^ Laboratory Director

written approval of this laboratory. The This test report may not be reproduced except with the represent a product endorsement by test report relates only to the item(s) listed and does not N`'LAP or any other U.S. Government agency.

NYC-WTC 000094264

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000094264Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →