NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 01/LANDMARK INFORMATION
Document / 12 pages

Dangers of abrasive cleaning to historic buildings, undated

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Brief explaining risks of sandblasting and chemical treatments on historic building materials.

NYC-WTC_000093852–000093863

Folder label: “LANDMARK INFORMATION

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000093855
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Preservation Brief 6: Dangers of Abrasive Cleaning to Historic Buildings Page 4 of 12

true of abrasive cleaning methods because their inherent potential for causing damage is multiplied by the following factors:

the type and condition of the material being cleaned

• the size and sharpness of the grit particles or the mechanical equipment

• the pressure with which the abrasive grit or equipment is applied to the building surface

• the skill and care of the operator, and

• the constancy of the pressure on all surfaces during the cleaning process.

Pressure: The damaging effects of most of the variable factors involved in abrasive cleaning are self evident. However, the matter of pressure requires further explanation. In cleaning specifications, pressure is generally abbreviated as "psi" (pounds per square inch), which technically refers to the "tip" pressure, or the amount of pressure at the nozzle of the blasting apparatus. Sometimes "psig," or pressure at the gauge (which may be many feet away, at the other end of the hose), is used in place of "psi." These terms are often incorrectly used interchangeably.

Despite the apparent care taken by most architects and building cleaning contractors to prepare specifications for pressure cleaning which will not cause harm to the delicate fabric of a historic building, it is very difficult to ensure that the same amount of pressure is applied to all parts of the building. For example, if the operator of the pressure equipment stands on the ground while cleaning a two-story structure, the amount of force reaching the first story will be greater than that hitting the second story, even if the operator stands on scaffolding or in a cherry picker, because of the "line drop" in the distance from the pressure source to the nozzle. Although technically it may be possible to prepare cleaning specifications with tight controls that would eliminate all but a small margin of error, it may not be easy to find professional cleaning firms willing to work under such restrictive conditions. The fact is that many professional building cleaning firms do not really understand the extreme delicacy of historic building fabric, and how it differs from modern construction materials. Consequently, they may accept building cleaning projects for which they have no experience.

The amount of pressure used in any kind of cleaning treatment which involves pressure, whether it is dry or wet grit, chemicals or just plain water, is crucial to the outcome of the cleaning project. Unfortunately, no standards have been established for determining the correct pressure for cleaning each of the many historic building materials which would not cause harm. The considerable discrepancy between the way the building cleaning industry and architectural conservators define "high" and "low" pressure cleaning plays a significant role in the difficulty of creating standards.

Nonhistoric/Industrial: A representative of the building cleaning industry might consider "high" pressure water cleaning to be anything over 5,000 psi, or even as high as 10,000 to 15,000 psi! Water under this much pressure may be necessary to clean industrial structures or machinery, but would destroy most historic building materials. Bronze statuary may be cleaned Industrial chemical cleaning commonly utilizes pressures between gently using crushed walnut 1,000 and 2,500 psi. shells. Photo: NPS files.

Historic: By contrast, conscientious dry or wet abrasive cleaning of a historic structure would be conducted within the range of 20 to 100 psi at a range of 3 to 12 inches. Cleaning at this low pressure requires the use of a very fine 00 or 0 mesh grit forced through a nozzle with a 1/4-inch opening. A similar, even more delicate method being adopted by architectural conservators uses a micro-abrasive grit on small, hard-to-clean areas of carved, cut or molded ornament on a building facade. Originally developed by museum conservators for cleaning sculpture, this

http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/briefs/briefD6.htm 03/05/2002 NYC-WTC 000093855

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000093855Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →