NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 44/No folder label
Document / 26 pages

Programmatic agreement for building cleaning following disaster, March 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 72%

Forwarded programmatic agreement documentation addressing post-disaster building cleaning procedures and eligible building list for recovery efforts.

NYC-WTC_000164903–000164928
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000164921
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

exterior surfaces. Dust that has re-calcified, or hardened on surfaces should be carefully removed under the direction of a conservator or preservation professional so that historic fabric is not damaged. Debris and dust should be properly disposed of.

o The owner should insure that potential disaster related damages to the to the building (which may include, but are not limited to, openings in building facades and roofs, cracks, open mortar joints, and weakened or damaged materials) are identified by a qualified professional prior to cleaning the facade. Precautions should be taken prior to cleaning applications, as dust or cleaning agents may enter the building through openings in the facade or fabric.

Cleaning Methods: (See WTC Site Specific Considerations First)

Based on building materials and overall building condition one of the following methods of cleaning will most likely be used:

Water Cleaning- Water cleaning utilizes the application of a gentle, low pressure, clean water spray. High-pressure water spray should not be used and can cause significant damage to building materials. Applied water pressures should not exceed 250 psi, but it must be noted that even low or moderate pressure water applications (100-400 psi) can damage some masonry. Prolonged application of water to a building can result in staining caused by the leaching out of minerals within the building material, the corrosion of embedded ferrous metals, and damage finishes on the interior of the building. Water cleaning should not be conducted during cold weather, as freeze/thaw cycles may cause damage to facades.

Chemical Cleaning- Chemical cleaning may be utilized alone or in conjunction with a water cleaning. Water cleaning may be accompanied by the use of a nonionic detergent applied with fiber brushes and followed with subsequent water applications as specified in the determined cleaning program. The use of acidic or alkaline chemicals for cleaning can cause damage to building materials as well as pose health, safety, and environmental risks. Cleaning poultices are composed of absorbent powders mixed with a liquid to create a wet paste that can be applied to a building. Poultices allow controlled application and removal and minimize rinsing requirements.

Abrasive Cleaning- Abrasive cleaning involves mechanically abrading a surface to remove soiling. Traditional abrasive cleaning techniques are not suitable for cleaning historic buildings as building materials can easily be damaged.

Acceptable and gentle abrasive cleaning methods are highly sophisticated. Consult Historic Building Facades: The Manual for Maintenance and Rehabilitation published by New York Landmarks Conservancy for information regarding acceptable methods of abrasive cleaning.

18

NYC-WTC_000164921

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000164921Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →