All QC runs and samples associated with batches 11/21/01, and 12/19/01 gave typical
results similar to all the previous batches analyzed on the new Agilent GCMS for method
525.2 with the following exception: the Endrin breakdown result was suddenly greater
than 70%. Unfortunately this was not realized until 3 weeks after the injections were
made. The instrument was removed from service and a thorough investigation was begun
to attempt to determine and correct the causes of the high Endrin breakdown as well as
low recoveries of several other less stable compounds. Involved in our investigation was
Agilent staff, Finnigan staf, our 2 service consultants from MDL Systems, our gas
suppliers - Air Gas Corporation, and members of our staff. Simultanously, 4 other
instruments in the laboratory suddenly experienced high Endrin breakdown also.
Around January 22, the problems were isolated and for the most part corrected for each
instrument. The causes were due to a combination of various problems, some which may
have been building over time, i.e. bad vial of Endrin standard, contaminated gas lines and
gas purifying traps, much too high injection port temperatures, bad lot of GC septa,
improper design of Finnigan Ion Trap injection port, and inherently poor design of
Agilent GC injection ports. Though we can not be conclusive as to which causes
contributed the most to the problem, and which ones affected each instrument exactly, all
in all with many corrections made, we believe we are now able to control the Endrin
breakdown levels. In addition, we observed improved recoveries thus far for the 18
compounds analyzed by our method 525.2.
In order for me to reaffirm the reliability of data obtained from the original injections for
these 2 batches, we reinjected them and compared the new data against the original data.
All results agee with improved responses for problem compounds and surrogates. The
Endrin breakdown was 10.6%. Thus, I reported the originally obtained data but the
newly obtained Endrin % breakdown result.
NYC-WTC_000058146
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
NYC-WTC_000058146Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally
Calibration curve and quality control results for Method 525.2 organic compound analysis, showing compound recovery percentages and relative standard deviations.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.941