Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• Pesticide residue analysis results, sample AD28043, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000058147

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD27984 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055409

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28164 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055469

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28105 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055391

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28167 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055481

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28049 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055451

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28166 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055475

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28046 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055439

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28104 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055457

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28047 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055445

  · similarity 0.994 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD27986 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055421

  · similarity 0.994 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD27985 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055415

  · similarity 0.993 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28044 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055427

  · similarity 0.992 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Sample AD28045 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055433

  · similarity 0.992 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Reference standard analysis for Method 525.2, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055385

  · similarity 0.990 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Spiked sample analysis for Method 525.2, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055397

  · similarity 0.990 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Duplicate spike analysis for Method 525.2, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055403

  · similarity 0.988 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Analytical results for sample AD28308 using Method 525.2, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000058131

  · similarity 0.988 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Method 525 pesticide results, sample AD28322, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055835

  · similarity 0.988 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Method 525 pesticide results, sample AD28323, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055800

  · similarity 0.987 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Organic chemical sample results, Nov-Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 20

  NYC-WTC_000030450

  · similarity 0.983 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Organic chemical sample results, Nov-Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 20

  NYC-WTC_000030430

  · similarity 0.979 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Pesticide analysis results, sample AE10997, May 2002 · Box DEP Box 15

  NYC-WTC_000015985

  · similarity 0.979 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Quality control check results, sample AE11755, May 2002 · Box DEP Box 15

  NYC-WTC_000015978

  · similarity 0.975 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS reference standard results, sample AE11555, May-June 2002 · Box DEP Box 15

  NYC-WTC_000012597

  · similarity 0.975 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Pesticide analysis results, sample AE11755, May 2002 · Box DEP Box 15

  NYC-WTC_000016006

  · similarity 0.974 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS pesticide analysis results, sample AE11911, May-June 2002 · Box DEP Box 15

  NYC-WTC_000012610

  · similarity 0.973 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

Sample AD28106 Method 525.2 analysis, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000055463

Laboratory results for sample AD28106 analyzing pesticides and organic contaminants using Method 525.2.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 30

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

Spiked sample analysis for Method 525.2, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000055397

Quality control spiked sample results for Method 525.2 verifying recovery rates for target chemical compounds.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 30

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.