Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• Method 525 reference standard results, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055831

  · similarity 0.984 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Method 525 reference standard results, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055814

  · similarity 0.984 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Lab blank results, sample AD27491, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055140

  · similarity 0.984 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Method 525 reference standard results, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055792

  · similarity 0.982 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Reference standard analysis results, sample AD27232, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000057057

  · similarity 0.981 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Duplicate spiked sample analysis, sample AD28318, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000058053

  · similarity 0.980 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Calibration standard results, sample AD28319, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000058039

  · similarity 0.979 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Method 525 calibration standard results, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055789

  · similarity 0.979 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Reference standard results, sample AD27491, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055146

  · similarity 0.979 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Spiked sample analysis for Method 525.2, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055397

  · similarity 0.979 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Laboratory blank results, sample AD28319, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000058042

  · similarity 0.978 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Method 525 pesticide results, sample AD28847, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000055811

  · similarity 0.977 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Calibration standard results, sample AD28048, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000058116

  · similarity 0.977 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Calibration standard results, sample AD28172, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 30

  NYC-WTC_000058031

  · similarity 0.977 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• Spiked sample analysis results, sample AE11755, May 2002 · Box DEP Box 15

  NYC-WTC_000016020

  · similarity 0.976 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

Reference standard results, sample AD27776, Dec 2001

NYC-WTC_000055178

Laboratory reference standard analysis for sample AD27776 showing response values and detection limits.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 30

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

Duplicate spiked sample analysis, sample AD28318, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000058053

Duplicate spike quality control analysis for EPA Method 525.2 pesticide screening on 1/16/2002, document image quality degraded.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 30

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.