Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31642, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049734

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31633, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049713

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30010, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016881

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31632, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049723

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS blank analysis results for sample AD31586, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049693

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analytical comments for sample AD29782, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037406

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30983, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018238

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29791, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037207

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS results for unknowns, sample AD31135, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018983

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31640, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049762

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31277, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016951

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS blank analysis results for sample AD29228, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049795

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis report for AD29791, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037427

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30110, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016891

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD29666, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036831

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS results for unknowns, sample AD31130, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019004

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS analysis results for sample AD30253, February 2002

NYC-WTC_000049703

GCMS analysis report for sample AD30253 conducted on February 11, 2002.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 28

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS analytical comments for sample AD29782, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000037406

Laboratory notes stating that GCMS scanning of sample AD29782 did not reveal the presence of unusual compounds.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.