Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS sample analysis report for AD29791, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037427

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29781, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037197

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS blank analysis results for sample AD31586, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049693

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS results for unknowns, sample AD31216, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019015

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31133, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018994

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS blank analysis results for sample AD29228, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049795

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30631, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017290

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29790, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037146

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GC/MS analysis results for sample AD30905, Jan 28 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018640

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29791, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037207

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30253, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049703

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GC/MS analysis results for sample AD30908, Jan 28 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018684

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31277, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016951

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29792, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037126

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29788, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037156

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31632, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049723

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD30484, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017940

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30010, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016881

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS results for unknowns, sample AD31217, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019025

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30350, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017069

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS results for unknowns, sample AD31135, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018983

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29187, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037116

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29664, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037188

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD29666, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036831

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS results for unknowns, sample AD31130, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019004

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD30487, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017108

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analytical comments identifying dimethylbenzenesulfonamide, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037397

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30473, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017969

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30117, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016773

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS results for unknowns, sample AD31131, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018972

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD25874, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017981

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29669, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036902

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD31249, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016929

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29564, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036915

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29668, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036888

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS blank analysis results for sample AD29926, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037367

  · similarity 0.992 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS analytical comments for sample AD29782, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000037406

Laboratory notes stating that GCMS scanning of sample AD29782 did not reveal the presence of unusual compounds.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS analysis report for sample AD30117, January 2002

NYC-WTC_000016773

Laboratory GCMS analysis report for sample AD30117 conducted on January 9, 2002, by analyst DLV.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.