Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS comments for sample AD28157, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033800

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD28269, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000034180

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD28427, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000034331

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28666, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000034830

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30426, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017724

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28149, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033765

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD28263, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000034198

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30351, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017833

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30357, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017748

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28155, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033834

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29523, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036798

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30425, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017703

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30251, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017675

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29563, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036712

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019130

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD28271, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000034213

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30352, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017808

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30252, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017854

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GC/MS calibration data for sample 30647, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018546

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28159, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033752

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS calibration table for TCLP analysis, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033911

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis results for sample AD28335, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033974

  · similarity 0.993 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS calibration table with surrogate recovery data, Feb 16, 2002 · Box DEP Box 14

  NYC-WTC_000009629

  · similarity 0.993 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GC/MS calibration data for sample 28322, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018492

  · similarity 0.993 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS blank analysis results for sample AD28143, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033707

  · similarity 0.990 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS Method 508 calibration data sheet, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033886

  · similarity 0.990 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS blank analysis report for sample AE12224, June 2002 · Box DEP Box 15

  NYC-WTC_000015040

  · similarity 0.988 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS comments for sample AD28901, Dec 17 2001

NYC-WTC_000035700

Laboratory notes stating the GCMS scan of sample AD28901 revealed no unusual compounds.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS comments for sample AD28149, Nov 2001

NYC-WTC_000033765

Analytical commentary for sample AD28149 dated November 29, 2001, noting no unusual compounds but low recovery rates for LCS standards.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 21

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.