Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28903, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035580

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28966, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035598

  · similarity 0.999 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28859, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035505

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28898, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035683

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29190, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035843

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29290, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036371

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28754, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035282

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019061

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016699

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28857, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035489

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29086, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036020

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28855, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035473

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28856, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035481

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28801, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035452

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28759, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035330

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30086, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016746

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29028, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035990

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28758, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035314

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD28431, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000034280

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD28267, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000034415

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28141, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033856

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD26830, Dec 11 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000032223

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, Sample AD28141, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033865

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28163, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033847

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD27831, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033695

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD26477, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000031729

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD26827, Dec 21 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000032172

  · similarity 0.995 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28965, Dec 2001

NYC-WTC_000035589

Lab report noting bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate detection and recovery issues in a water sample.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS comments for sample AD28163, Dec 2001

NYC-WTC_000033847

Analytical commentary for sample AD28163 dated December 6, 2001, noting no unusual compounds and low recovery rates for LCS standards.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 21

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.