NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 21/GCMS X 11/20/01 A 11/26/01
Document / 9 pages

GCMS unknowns analysis results for sample AD28326, Jan 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Laboratory report documenting GCMS analysis for unknown compounds and surrogate recovery in sample AD28326 conducted on January 9, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000033945–000033953

Folder label: “GCMS X 11/20/01 A 11/26/01”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000033946
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Comments for Sample AD28326 - Analysis $GCMS

Vestchester Dept, of Labs & Research Jser: Galos, Marie Jate: 01-09-2002 Time: 09:42:53

i scan of the extract prepared for the 508 analysis, from 35-550 amu using a lass spectrometer, does not reveal the presence of non-target compounds.

NYC-WTC_000033946

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000033946Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

GCMS comments for sample AD28265, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

NYC-WTC_000033825

Analytical commentary for sample AD28265 dated November 29, 2001, noting no unusual compounds but low recovery rates for LCS standards.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.997

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
GCMS comments for sample AD28149, Nov 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

NYC-WTC_000033780

Analytical commentary for sample AD28149 dated November 29, 2001, noting no unusual compounds but low recovery rates for LCS standards.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.997

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →