Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS comments for sample AD28898, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035683

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30113, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016717

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30109, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016854

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28966, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035598

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019061

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29086, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036020

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis results for sample AD28334, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033936

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29290, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036371

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD27775, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033623

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD28965, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035589

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30107, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016872

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28860, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035765

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD26477, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000031729

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30009, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016816

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD26827, Dec 21 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000032172

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30114, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016863

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS analysis results for sample AD26830, Dec 11 2001

NYC-WTC_000032223

Laboratory report documenting GCMS analysis of sample AD26830 identifying unknown compounds on December 11, 2001.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 21

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS analysis report for sample AD30107, January 2002

NYC-WTC_000016872

Laboratory GCMS analysis report for sample AD30107 conducted on January 9, 2002, by analyst DLV.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.