NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 17/524 2/6/02 - 2/7/02
Document / 148 pages

VOC analysis results, sample AE02089, Feb 7 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Laboratory results for volatile organic compounds in sample AE02089 analyzed on February 7, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000019422–000019569

Folder label: “524 2/6/02 - 2/7/02”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000019516
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

User: Huhn, William Westchester Dept, of Labs & Research Date: 02/07/2002 Time: 12:24:14 Sample: AE02089 Analysis: $02524 Volatile Organic Compounds-Cal 2 Units: ug Started: 2/7/02 01:08 Ended: 2/7/02 01:08 Analyst: BH Result source: a:\0206c10b.rr Page: 2 Component Name Viol Result MDL ; 49 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 9.9" T .5 750 2-chlorotoluene 10 .5 51 4-chlorotoluene 9.4 .5 FaTg7E TERT-butylbenzene 10 .5 1,2,4-trimethyibenzene 9.9 .5 SEC-butylbenzene 10 .5 $4 P-isopropyltoluene 10 .5 1,3-dichlorobenzene 10 .5 1,4-dichlorobenzene 10 .5 N-butylbenzene 10 .5 1,2-dichlorobenzene 10 .5 0 .1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 10 .5 Hexachlobutadiene 9.9 .5 588 Naphthalene 9.8 .5 855 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene 10 .5 64 ‘Nitrobenzene ' LSPEC 73 58.02585

NYC-WTC_000019516

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000019516Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

DEP document fragment, February 2002 · Box DEP Box 17

NYC-WTC_000019326

Fragmented document page from DEP Box 17 folder dated early February 2002 containing illegible text and sample identifiers.

7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.998

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →