Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS comments for sample AD28897, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035727

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019111

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30356, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017770

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31466, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018405

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD30315, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019163

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis report, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016635

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD30255, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019153

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29022, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035820

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29028, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035990

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30016, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037244

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29089, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036000

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29459, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036447

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29457, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036425

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis summary, sample AD31374, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016149

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019100

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29024, Dec 18 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035909

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019090

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AE00005, Feb 13 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000050088

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31406, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018362

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis report, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016646

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample results, AE00899, Feb 26, 2002 · Box DEP Box 14

  NYC-WTC_000009466

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis summary, sample AD27392, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016125

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30009, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016816

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis summary, sample AD31377, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016136

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis report, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016667

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AE01231, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 14

  NYC-WTC_000009773

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis log for sample AD30603 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017233

  · similarity 0.992 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000019070

Laboratory report of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis for sample AD30115 conducted on January 9, 2002.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29028, Dec 2001

NYC-WTC_000035990

Laboratory report noting detection of bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate in sample AD29028 analyzed on December 18, 2001.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.