Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD30424, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017079

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30111, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016826

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD30423, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017088

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30023, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016845

  · similarity 0.998 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD31346, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017016

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29465, Jan 22 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049861

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30257, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016764

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30631, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017290

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30110, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016891

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis log for sample AD30632 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017320

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD29284, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049805

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD30484, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017940

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31133, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018994

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29562, Jan 22 2002 · Box DEP Box 28

  NYC-WTC_000049870

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30472, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017931

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30483, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017949

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GC/MS analysis results for sample AD30908, Jan 28 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018684

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30490, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017913

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analytical comments for sample AD29782, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037406

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS scan comments for sample AD31343, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016981

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD31250, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016940

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30117, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016773

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD31249, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016929

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD31342, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000017004

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD31276, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016961

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS unknowns analysis report for sample AD30487, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000017108

Laboratory analysis report from the DEP identifying unknown compounds in environmental sample AD30487 using GCMS on January 18, 2002.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS analysis results for sample AD30472, Jan 2002

NYC-WTC_000017931

Laboratory report documenting GCMS analysis of sample AD30472 conducted on January 24, 2002.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.