Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS comments for sample AD28898, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035683

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30114, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016863

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD26830, Dec 11 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000032223

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results sample AD29290, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036371

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30009, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016816

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28756, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035298

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019121

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28860, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035765

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29086, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036020

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019081

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28755, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035290

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28758, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035314

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28753, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035274

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019061

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28750, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035249

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD28752, Dec 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035266

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS analysis report for sample AD30107, January 2002

NYC-WTC_000016872

Laboratory GCMS analysis report for sample AD30107 conducted on January 9, 2002, by analyst DLV.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS comments for sample AD28860, Dec 17 2001

NYC-WTC_000035765

Lab notes for sample AD28860 indicate no unusual compounds detected but recovery was below acceptance range.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.