Copies and versions

Copies are not independent tests. A high similarity score can also match a reused form; it does not establish which copy came first or whether their findings agree.

• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30108, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016835

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD27775, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000033623

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD30109, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016854

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30107, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016872

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28897, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035727

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD31458, Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000018334

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019070

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS comments for sample AD28898, Dec 17 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035683

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results, sample AD30255, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019153

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis report for sample AD30114, January 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000016863

  · similarity 0.997 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD26830, Dec 11 2001 · Box DEP Box 21

  NYC-WTC_000032223

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29089, December 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000036000

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis results for sample AD29964, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000037269

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS analysis comments for sample AD29024, Dec 18 2001 · Box DEP Box 22

  NYC-WTC_000035909

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
• GCMS sample analysis results, Jan 2002 · Box DEP Box 16

  NYC-WTC_000019121

  · similarity 0.996 (not a probability)machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Selected filing

GCMS analysis report for sample AD30009, January 2002

NYC-WTC_000016816

Laboratory GCMS analysis report for sample AD30009 conducted on January 9, 2002, by analyst DLV.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 16

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.

Comparison filing

GCMS analysis comments, sample AD29089, December 2001

NYC-WTC_000036000

Analysis comments for sample AD29089 reporting no unusual compounds in GCMS scan but noting one compound recovery above acceptance range in LCS Standard.

Environmental Protection, Dept. of · Volume NYC-WTC0002 · Box DEP Box 22

Open the record for the City’s folder metadata.