NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 6 pages

NYC-WTC_000234815

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000234815–000234820
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000234816
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

DRAFT

NYC-DEP 9/24/01 5 schools, distant 15 0 0 0.008 by Highest was PS64, 600 East 6*^ from controlled zone PCM Street (no TEM analysis done). US Public Health 9/18/01- Fresh Kills Landfill 10 9 0 0.07 by No TEM analysis was done. Service 9/19/01 PCM 9/19/01 Inside controlled 2 1 0 0.019 by No TEM analysis was done. zone PCM

* Approximately equivalent to indoor clearance level for residences or schools. EPA results by TEM method, NYC-DEP by PCM @ 0.1 fibers per cc by PCM method; US-OSHA permissible exposure limit for 8 hour time weighted average.

Interpretation: Dusty work in control zone or Fresh Kills Landfill continues to have the potential to generate elevated levels of asbestos fibers. Continued use of appropriate respiratory protection for workers in or near potentially dusty locations or tasks is indicated. Dust suppression measures should be enhanced. Additional personal monitoring underway.

o H

S Q I—i o o I o o o Draft: 9/25/01, 8:22 PM \EnvironmentalMonitoringUpdate_9_25 Page: 2 of 6

NYC-WTC_000234816

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000234816Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →