NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 3 pages

NYC-WTC_000206751

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000206751–000206753
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000206752
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Personal air monitoring

Agency Location Activity N N above Maximum Comment samples OSHA (fibers per PEL* cc) Con Ed Hot Zone Cable splicing 2 0 <0.007 in manhole Hot Zone Walking - 4 0 0.012 various locations OSHA Data not received at DOH as of 4 pm Federal Data not received at DOH as of 4 pm Occupational Health *0.1 fibers per cc. US-OSHA permissible exposure limit for 8 hour time weighted average. Results are by PCM method.

Bulk (settled) dust

Agency Date Location N N asbestos N> 1% Maximum Comment samples detected (%) USEPA 9/18/01 Hot zone, close in 11 10 6 1.9%

Interpretation: The most recent ambient air samples in and around WTC and Fresh Kills, generally well below permissible exposure limits for occupational exposure and, in most cases, for community exposure. However, potential for higher exposures exist based on past personal air samples and presence of asbestos in dust and debris. Continued use of appropriate respiratory protection for workers in or near potentially dusty locations or tasks is indicated. Dust suppression measures should be expanded. Additional personal monitoring underway.

o H

I o o I o o uc Draft: 9/21/01 \MatteSunimary_9_20 Page: 2 of 3 CO

CO

NYC-WTC_000206752

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000206752Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →