NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 3 pages

NYC-WTC_000200140

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000200140–000200142
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000200141
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

ATC ASSOCIATES, INC 104 E 25th Street, 10th Floor New York, NY 10010 Tel. 212-353-8280 Fax 212-353-8306

REPORT DATE: 08-21-02

CLIENT: Taylor Environmental Group, Inc.

PROJECT NAME: SCA/Stuyvesant HS 4th Floor

PROJECT NUMBER: M477-15217/29881

SAMPLED BY: Client

SAMPLE DATE 08-20-02 DATE RECEIVED: 08-20-02 DATE ANALYZED: 08-20-02

SAMPLE MEDIA: Air Samples ANALYSIS REQUIRED: Method NIOSH 7082

ANALYSIS RESULTS

SAMPLE BATCH SAMPLE DESCRIPTION LEAD DETECTION ID NO. CONCENTRATION LIMIT (MB/m’) (Pg/m’)

4-Ll 21336 4th Floor Corridor @ Rm 440 <1.3 1.3

4-L2 21336 Rm 450 Robotics Conyer <1.3 1.3

4-L3 21336 4th Floor Corridor @ Top of Esc. West Stair <1.3 1.3

4-L4 21336 Rm 411 Computer Rm <1.3 1.3

4-L5 21336 4th Floor Corridor @ East Stair Rm 401/402 <1.4 1.4 FBI 21336 Field Blank - NO FILTER

FB2 21336 Field Blank <1.5 ug 1.5 ug

NOTE 1: THE REPORTING LIMIT (RL) IS 3.0 ug NOTE 2: At the present time there are no regulatory levels or requirements for indoor airborne lead in area samples. However, OSHA has established an action level of 30 pg/m’ and a permissible exposure level (PEL) of 50 pg/m’ for personal samples. NOTE 3: Blank units are in pg

CITY_21MC100_011273988

NYC-WTC_000200141

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000200141Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →