NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

NYC-WTC_000199903

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000199903–000199904
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000199904
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Metals: OSHA has taken 626 air samples to monitor worker exposures to dusts, fumes, oxides, and other compounds of metals such as antimony, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, vanadium, zinc, cadmium, magnesium, arsenic, and mercury. Results from these samples are generally well below the applicable OSHA limits. However, torch cutting and burning structural steel at the rubble pile have resulted in instances of overexposures as follows: copper (9); iron oxide (20); lead (12); and cadmium (2). Accordingly, OSHA is recommending that workers engaged in these operations wear appropriate respiratory protection.

Ionizing Radiation: A survey of the rubble pile was conducted on 10/22-10/23 to check for latent radiation with particular attention to alpha radiation. Preliminary results show no elevated levels.

Dioxins: OSHA has taken samples for dioxin and these samples were analyzed by ERA. One initial san^jle, representing exposure directly on the pile, showed elevated levels of dioxins when compared to ambient background levels. This value was comparable to the levels found by EPA sampling. The dioxins at this location are being emitted from die on-going rubble fire. Additional sampling was conducted around the perimeter of the pile and revealed levels that . were considerably lower than those on the rubble pile. Dioxins are considered collectively as suspect human carcinogens. OSHA does not have a worker standard for dioxins. OSHA is coordinating with EPA, and the Salt Lake City Analytical Laboratory to fully assess the risk posed by the elevated levels of dioxins.

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons OSHA has taken 132 samples. The majority of the samples have not shown the presence of benzo(a)pyrene and/or one or more of five additional fused polycyclic hydrocarbons; anthracene, acridine, pyrene, chrysene and phenanthrene. Sample results to date have identified seven samples which reached or exceeded OSHA’s coal tar pitch volatile PEL of 0.2mg/m^. These personal samples were taken on the pile on iron workers and grappler operators. OSHA continues to strongly recommend the use of respiratory protection when working on the rubble pile. Freon R-22, Hydrogen Fluoride & Phosgene: OSHA has taken 94 samples for Freon R-22 (chlorodiflouromethane). The majority of sample results received to December I?* reveal non-detectable airborne levels. During operations involving Freon removal from the auxiliary chiller that started on 12/5/01, direct reading instrument revealed readings ranging from 100 ppm to one peak near a leaky valve of 500 ppm. SCB A tanks were and are being worn by workers, and masks are to be worn only when directreading instruments reveal 850ppmFreon and/or less than20.4% Oxygen. OSHA does not have an exposure limit for Freon R-22. (The NIOSH REL for Freon is lOOOppm..) In response to information about exposure to the decomposition by-products of Freon R-22 used in the air conditioning systems of WTC towers, sampling for hydrofluoric acid (HF) had been conducted. Results for HF revealed non-detectable levels. Sample results for phosgene to date show non-detectable levels.

Page 2 of 2

CITY_21MC100_003037217

NYC-WTC_000199904

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000199904Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →