10 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.985
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000199715
Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000199715–000199717
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
! Jessies Lsi^tonRA sitrep04-10.wpd
Fresh Kills (Apr 8) - Particulate Monitoring (Dataram)
o Resubmittal: Incorrect logging period was previously presented for Location P-8. o No change in results at the five stations (P-2, P-3, P-5, P-6, and P-8).
Fresh Kills (Apr 9) - Particulate Monitoring (Dataram)
o Nothing of significance reported at five stations (P-2, P-3, P-5, P-6, and P-8) based on daily average concentrations.
Ambient Air Sampling Locations
NYC / ER (Feb 5) - Metals
o 10 samples collected. o Arsenic nominally exceeded the EPA Removal Action level guidelines (based on a 30-year exposure) at Location A. Note: RAL for arsenic is 0.041 ug/m\ o The arsenic concentration at Location A was below the EPA Removal Action level guidelines adjusted to 1-year exposure, the NIOSH REL (2 ug/nT), and the OSHA PEL(10ug/inT o All other metals were either not detected or were below applicable EPA Removal Action level guidelines, OSHA PELs, and the NAAQS for lead. o Note: Elevated levels of chromium identified in the quality control (QC) samples (blanks) indicate that chromium is not present in these air samples at levels sufficiently above those in the control samples to be considered a valid result.
NYC / ER (Mar 10) - Asbestos Monitoring (Particulate Monitoring Stations - ‘Extended Network’)
o Results pending.
NYC / ER (Mar 26) - Asbestos Monitoring (Particulate Monitoring Stations - ‘Extended Network’)
o Results pending.
NYC / ER (Apr 9) - Particulate Monitoring (Dataram)
o Particulate levels noted at Locations L, N, and R were below the OSHA TWA. o Instruments operated approximately 8 hours. o Station L had an average of 25.97 ug/m’ with a maximum reading of
CITY_21MC100_002458722
NYC-WTC_000199716
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.980
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.971
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.967
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.966
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗5 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.966
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Filed elsewhere
4 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.961
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗4 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.961
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.990 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.972 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.970 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.963 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000130435
Summary of asbestos air sampling results from October 1, 2001, including PCM and TEM standard comparisons for NYC and NJ locations.
Similarity score 0.962 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.961 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content