NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

NYC-WTC_000199650

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000199650
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000199650
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document U< Z

EMSL Analytical, Inc. 107 Haddon Ave.. Westmont. NJ 08108 Phons: (856) 653-4800 Fax: (856)858-4960 Email; aaiegel®EMSL.com ^EMSL ^^g3SS3SSSSa k J Attn: Terry Smith Customer ID: USEPA30 U. S. EPA Customer PO: 2W-1104-NNLX HQ Financial Services Division 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.’NW Maildrbp2T34R Received: 05(06/02 lO'.QO AM Washington. DC 20460 Fax: Phone: 703-603-6849 EMSL Order: 040206055 Project: EMSL Project ID: Analysis Date 5'71Q2

Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound materials by Transmission Electron Microscopy via NYS ELAP Method 198.4 % MATRIX % NON­ ASBESTOS % TOTAL SAMPLE ID DESCRIPTION APPEARANCE MATERIAL ASBESTOS TYPES ASBESTOS IAQ-B-2A.001 Gray 100.0 None <1 ChiysotllG <1 OiO2OBOSS.OOOS Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 1AQ-8-2A-0O2 Gray 100.0 None <1 Chrysotile <1 IH020S0SS-O0O6 Non-Fibrous Homogeneous IAQ-B-2B-O01 Gray 100.0 None <1 Chrysotile «1 Ot02060SS-0007 Non-Fibrous Homogeneous IAQ-B-SC-001 Gray 100.0 None <1 Chrysotile <1 0i020S0S5.O00a Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Marques Stanard

Analyst Stephen Siegel, CIH or other approved signatory

Tills laboreiory is net responsible for %6SB351O9 tn loial sample when ih« resioue only is submilled for analysis. Tiic soovs reoon relates only lo Se items tested. This rrport may not be I I rep'sdueoo. cxcepl in full, wiihoul written approval by EMSL Aneiyllcsi. Inc : ACCREOITA '^vstateewpoioe7£

M' NO -2 1

1 CITY_21MC1OO_OO6729557

NYC-WTC_000199650

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000199650Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →