6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.997
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Asbestos fiber analysis data sheet, NYC BOE Project 14584
Machine-extracted title · confidence 92%Data summary sheet documenting TEM asbestos fiber counts and analytical parameters for air samples from a New York City Board of Education project.
NYC-WTC_000181676–000181677
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
ATC Associates 104 East 25 Street, New York, NY 10010 Phone: (212) 353-8280 Fax:(212)353-8306
Attn: Mr. Bernard Orlan Received: 3/28/02 3:30:00 PM N.Y.C. Board of Education ATC Group#: 7247 28-11 Queens Plaza North Analysis Date: 3/28/02 Long Island City, NY I HOI Fax: (212)475-4122 Phone: (212) 477-8941 Project: NYC-BOE PS 234M Project#: 14584-1823
Asbestos Fiber Analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Performed by EPA 40 CFR Part 763 Final Rule (AHERA) Analytical Asbestos Area Non Asbestos it Structures Sensitivity Concentration Sample l^olume Analyzed Asb Type(s) 0.5ft-! 5fi (S/cc) (S/inm^) (S/cc) Notes
01 1936.00 0.0450 0 NoneDetected 0 0 0.0044 <22.24 <0.0044 7247 -/
02 1936.00 0.0450 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0044 <22.24 <0.0044 724 7 -2
03 1952.00 0.0450 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0044 <22.24 <0.0044 7247 -3
04 1952.00 0.04.50 0 NoneDetected 0 0 0.0044 <22.24 <0.0044 7247 -4
05 1952.00 0.0450 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0044 <22.24 <0.0044 724 7 -!
06 1944.00 0.0450 0 NoneDetected 0 .0 •0.0044 <22.24 <0.0044 724 7 -6
07 1936.00 0.0450 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0044 <22.24 <0.0044 7247 -7
MARK PEYSAKHOV MICHAEL A. GORYCKI, Ph.D.
Analyzed by: ^proved by:
Disciaimer: The laboratory is not responsible for data reported in structures/cc, which is dependent on volume collected by non-laboratory personnel. This lab is only responsible for data reoorted in structures/mmf This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by ATC Associates Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the UIS. Government. This reports relates only to the samples reported above. Quality control data (including 95% confidence limits and laboratory and analysis' accuracy and precision) is available upon request.
Accredited for NVLAP #101187-0, NY Slate ELAP #10879
Page I uf 2
CONFIDENTIAL, CITY_21MC100_003468785 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER NO. 2, SEPT. 2008
NYC-WTC_000181676
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.997
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.997
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.996
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.996
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.996
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.996
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000181192
Laboratory report documenting TEM asbestos fiber analysis for air samples from NYC Board of Education PS 234M dated February 2002.
6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.996
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.996
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.995
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.995
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.995
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Filed elsewhere
No available related records indexed in this group.
More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.998 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.997 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content