NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 3 pages

Lead-in-Dust Wipe Sampling Report, PS 234M, June 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Confidential report from ATC Associates documenting lead-in-dust sampling activities conducted at P.S. 234M in June 2002 for the NYC Board of Education.

NYC-WTC_000178617–000178619
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000178619
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Although the lead-in-dust samples collected at P.S. 234M were not collected in response to lead abatement, the same thresholds are used since no other regulations or standards are applicable to this project.

Sampling Methodology ATC provided all laboratory analytical services in support of this limited inspection. ATC is certified by the New York State Department of Health’s Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program to perform lead and related analyses of environmental samples (Laboratory ID Number; 10879). The laboratory utilizes the United States Environmental Protection Agency analysis method number SW846-7420 and the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health method number 7082M.

The lead-in-dust samples were obtained by gently wiping a pre-measured surface area with non-alcohol moistened towelettes. ATC’s representative wore disposable gloves; a new glove was worn with each new sampling procedure, and care was taken to avoid contamination of the towclette and collection vial. Towelettes were then placed into 50ml plastic vials and i mmediately sealed. The chain of custody form was completed and documents the measurement of the area sampled.

Results of Dust Wipe Sampling Thirty-three (33) dust wipe samples were collected from areas indicated to ATC. Laboratory analysis indicates that all dust wipe samples collected from the indicated areas contain lead on floor, windowsill and exterior concrete or rough surfaces below the guideline level of 40 pg/ftb 250 pg/ft- and SOOug. ff respectively. See laboratory' report and chain of custody for more details.

Limits of the limited dust wipe sampling Dust sampling was conducted at NYC-BOE request. The results of this report are applicable for the time the testing was performed. If questions arise concerning lead content in or on components and/or locations not tested by ATC, then additional testing services should be procured. ATC makes no representation or warranty concerning the standards and specifications provided in the HUD Guidelines and the NYC-BOE protocol.

It is our pleasure to provide these limited lead services to New York City Board of Education. If you have any questions regarding this limited lead-in-dust wipe sampling, please do not hesitate to call me at (212) 353-8280 extension #211.

Sincerely, A TC Associates, Inc.

/Yiannis Efstath Senior Project Manager

r.S. 234M OATC June !0. 2002

CONFIDENTIAL, CITY_2IMCl00_003390093 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER NO. 2, SEPT. 2008

NYC-WTC_000178619

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000178619Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

No available related records indexed in this group.

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000178611

Confidential report prepared by ATC Associates for the NYC Board of Education documenting lead-in-dust sampling at P.S. 234M in May 2002.

Similar indexed content

NYC-WTC_000178714

Report prepared by ATC Associates documenting limited lead-in-dust wipe sampling conducted at P.S. 150M in May 2002.

Similar indexed content

Compare copies and versions →