31 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗WTC environmental investigation report, Sep 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
NYC-WTC_000178388–000178443
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 56 of 56 t There are many uncertainties about whether this risk would be realized. The first is that even though the risk of cancer is not linear, the risk estimates treat it as linear (36). Therefore there may be an overestimate of risk at low exposures compared with the studied populations. The air levels of silica we are examining here are well below those studied in worker populations; therefore even this small increased risk may be overestimated. Conversely, the studied populations were adult workers. So risk estimates based on these studies may underestimate risks to children and to adults with respiratory disorders.
Less soluble materials have a longer residence time in the lung and therefore have a greater potential to contribute to tissue damage or malignant disease. Within SVF types, glass fibers and slag wool are considered the most soluble, and therefore least toxic. Mineral wool is less soluble than glass wool. Fibers longer than approximately 15 microns, the diameter of a macrophage, are also cleared less efficiently, leading to a greater potential for adverse effects (26).
t Early studies often relied upon injection and implantation studies, which may not accurately predict a pulmonary response from inhalation exposures. A review of inhalation studies indicates that glass wool did not cause pulmonary fibrosis or lung cancer in these animal studies (47). A recent study by Hesterberg indicates no increase in pulmonary fibrosis or lung cancer even at doses of 222 f/cc, although cancer incidence in control animals was considered high (51).
This slope factor is based on epidemiologic studies and assumes a linear dose response for cancer, even at very low environmental doses (0.23 excess cancers per million people exposed for each f/cc of asbestos.) This type of cancer risk estimate may over predict risk and does not take into account any lower threshold for effect, which may exist. Additionally, the EPA slope factor was designed to apply equally to all types of asbestos, and all fibers greater than 5 microns in length (IRIS).
+ Variability in these factors is not accounted for in the EPA slope factor because it does not include synergistic effects with the effects of smoking (48).
t However, because asbestos as a percentage of settled surface dust was elevated, an area with significant dust may be capable of generating higher airborne levels of asbestos, especially during high activity.
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gOv/asbestos/lowennanhattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003 NYC-WTC_000178443
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗43 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.962
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178054
Preliminary health evaluation report regarding the World Trade Center site submitted in October 2001.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.961
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗14 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.959
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176156
Report enclosure detailing air and settled dust sampling results for Building 26, including PM size fraction analysis.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗9 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.994 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.952 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.950 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.950 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.949 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.948 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content