NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 56 pages

WTC environmental investigation report, Sep 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.

NYC-WTC_000178388–000178443
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000178437
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 50 of 56 REFERENCES

1. Matthews, Kevin. A World Trade Center© http://www.GreatBuildinqs.com/buildinqs/World Trade Center.html

2. Eagar, Thomas W. and Christopher Musso. Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation.© JOM, 53(12)(2001): pp. 8-11.

3. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney. World Trade Center - New York - Some Engineering Aspects © http://www.civil.usvd.edu.au/wtc.htm

4. The World Trade Center© http://www.skvscraper.0rg/tallest/t wtc.htm

5. Mayor's Office of Emergency Management, City of New York. Vehicular and Pedestrian Restrictions in Manhattan Due to the World Trade Center Terrorist Attack 2001.

6. Johnson D. World Trade Center History.© Infoplease.com. 8 2002 Learning Network. 14 March 2002. http://www.infoplease.com/spot/wtcl.html.

7. Quality Assurance Technical Support Laboratory, IT Corporation. "Special Investigative Audit #14: Environmental Data Trend Report: World Trade Center Disaster: Final Update for Data Collected 9/11/2001 to 4/24/2002 from Lower Manhattan.© Contract Number: 68-W- 01-010. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.: May 16, 2002.

8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. World Trade Center Environmental Ambient Monitoring Data, http://www.epa.qov/wtc/

9. U.S. Geological Survey. Environmental Studies of the World Trade Center Area After the September 11, 2001 Attack. Open File Report OFR-01-0429. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado: 2001

10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, Final Methodology for Conducting Risk Assessments at Asbestos Superfund Sites Part 2: Technical Background Document, Interim Version, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, San Francisco, CA, 1999.

11. Merck Chemical Index. Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, N.J., 1998

12. National Institute of Safety and Health. Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C., 2001

13. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). TLV Documentation: Calcium Sulfate, 2001.

14. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). TLV Documentation: Calcium Hydroxide, 2001.

15. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). TLV Documentation: Calcium Carbonate, 2001.

16. Hunter D. The Disease of Occupations, Ed. The English Universities Press, Ltd., London, 1975.

17. Beal AJ, Griffin OG, Nagelschmidt G. Safety in Mines Research Establishment (SMRT) Research Report No. 72, 1956.

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gOv/asbestos/lowermanhattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003 NYC-WTC_000178437

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000178437Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →