31 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗WTC environmental investigation report, Sep 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
NYC-WTC_000178388–000178443
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 5 of 56 Materials in Indoor Dust, November 4-December 11, 2001
LIST OF SAMPLING EVENT PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1. Residential Vacuum Sample
Photo 2. Residential Air Sampling
Photo 3. Residential Air Sampling
Photo 4. Residential Air Sampling
Photo 5. Residential Air Sampling
Photo 6. Residential Air Sampling
Photo 7. Outside Bulk Sampling
Photo 8. Sampling Head
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY From November 4 through December 11, 2001, environmental samples were collected in and around 30 residential buildings in lower Manhattan. In addition, four buildings above 59th Street were sampled and used as a comparison area for this investigation. The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH) and the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) conducted this limited investigation with support and collaboration from the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps Readiness Force and the World Trade Center Environmental Assessment Working Group. The purpose of the sampling was to assess the composition of both outdoor and indoor settled surface and airborne dust within residential areas around the World Trade Center. This information was used to help determine whether additional public health actions are needed to address any remaining World Trade Center-related dust inside residential areas. The information collected could also be used to compare the findings from the locations that were known or were likely to have received dust directly from the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, to findings from areas that were unlikely to have received dust directly from the disaster (comparison areas).
Attention was given to those materials reasonably expected to be in the original dust cloud and in dust generated by ongoing activities at the World Trade Center. The focus was on building materials that have been shown to have irritant properties (e.g., synthetic vitreous fibers [SVF] and gypsum) and be associated with long-term health concerns (i.e., crystalline silica and asbestos). The samples collected during this investigation were analyzed for the following materials: asbestos, SVF, mineral components of concrete (crystalline silica, calcite, and portlandite), and mineral components of building wallboard (gypsum, mica, and halite). Efforts were made to get as much
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gOv/asbestos/lowermanhattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003 NYC-WTC_000178392
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗43 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.962
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178054
Preliminary health evaluation report regarding the World Trade Center site submitted in October 2001.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.961
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗14 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.959
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176156
Report enclosure detailing air and settled dust sampling results for Building 26, including PM size fraction analysis.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗9 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.990 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.978 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.975 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.975 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149537
Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
Similarity score 0.975 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.974 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content