NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 56 pages

WTC environmental investigation report, Sep 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.

NYC-WTC_000178388–000178443
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000178432
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 45 of 56 b. Noncancer Pulmonary Effects

Several of the minerals detected contribute to fibrotic lung damage and may result in several diseases that reduce lung function including silicosis, asbestosis, other mineral fibroses, emphysema, and other respiratory disorders. The mechanisms and pathology of these conditions are similar, and the effects of these agents may be considered at least additive. However, each material has a different toxicity based on the mineral properties of that material. Less biopersistent materials, such as SVF, have the least long-term toxicity, and more biopersistent material, such as asbestos, have greater long-term toxicity. In general, the order of toxicity may be SVF < mica < silica < asbestos, based on solubility and availability for clearance. No factors currently exist to combine risk estimates for these different materials.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the analytical results of samples taken between November 4 through December 11, 2001, and information collected during the sampling effort, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry make the following conclusions (not in order of importance).

■ Total fiber counts of air samples taken in lower Manhattan were similar to the comparison areas above 59th Street sampled during this investigation. The six lower Manhattan areas that had elevated total fiber counts were re-examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The TEM and SEM results indicated that neither asbestos nor SVF contributed to the elevated fiber counts.

• Low levels of asbestos were found in some settled surface dust, primarily below Chambers Street. Many of the lower Manhattan locations sampled had been previously cleaned prior to this investigation. No asbestos was detected in the comparison indoor dust samples taken north of 59th Street. The City of New York has conducted follow-up activities at the locations where asbestos was detected in settled surface dust. Only two follow-up locations, outdoor areas, required professional asbestos abatement. Following-up activity at the other locations did not find any asbestos containing materials.

• When compared with the results obtained from the comparison sampling locations, the lower Manhattan residential areas sampled by this investigation tended to have a greater percentage of SVF (primarily fiberglass), mineral components of concrete (quartz, calcite, and portlandite), and mineral components of building wallboard (gypsum, mica, and halite) in settled surface dust. However, the frequency of detections and prevalence patterns of these minerals are similar in both residential areas.

• Exposure to significant amounts of synthetic vitreous fibers (SVF), mineral components of concrete (quartz, calcite, and portlandite), and mineral components of building wallboard (gypsum) may cause skin rashes, eye irritation, and upper respiratory irritation, all of which have been voiced as concerns by

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gOv/asbestos/lowermaiihattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003 NYC-WTC_000178432

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000178432Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →