31 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗WTC environmental investigation report, Sep 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
NYC-WTC_000178388–000178443
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 37 of 56 Calcite, and portlandite increase the alkalinity of a fluid. Therefore, when these materials come into contact with tissue, they can cause irritation of skin and mucous membranes due to increased alkalinity. Any anhydrous gypsum in settled dust would be hygroscopic, which would be drying and irritating to the skin and eyes. Similarly, inhaled material may irritate or burn the respiratory tract (nose, throat, and lungs). The signs of an inflammatory response include redness, swelling, heat, and pain. Reaction to a skin irritant usually occurs at the point of contact between the skin and the substance. Eye irritants can cause redness, tearing, and itching of the eyes. Respiratory irritants can affect the nose, throat, and lungs. They may cause an itchy, watery nose, a scratchy or sore throat, coughing, chest tightness, wheezing, or difficulty breathing. All of these irritant effects are generally temporary and will begin to resolve once exposures cease.
Occupational exposure guidelines (NIOSH) and standards (OSHA) for these minerals were developed to prevent these irritant symptoms in most workers for a 40-hour workweek exposure (13,14,15). Although no guidelines or standards are available for skin contact or residential exposures, air exposure levels are established for both total and respirable minerals in air (see the following table). The airborne mineral levels measured in lower Manhattan are orders of magnitude below these occupational values. Although the occupational standards do not account for sensitive individuals or for extended periods of exposure, they provide a point of comparison. The levels of minerals seen in airborne dust of lower Manhattan are not at the levels known to be Irritating to healthy adult workers. However, it is possible that sensitive individuals may feel some irritation. Additionally, direct contact with the dust—or shorter periods of higher air concentrations caused by disturbing the dust—may result in more irritation than would be predicted by the reported airborne mineral levels.
Maximum Estimated NIOSH REL OSHA PEL Mineral Value in Lower (pg/m^) (pg/m^) Manhattan (pg/m^) 10,000 (total) 15,000 (total) 14J (PMIOO) Gypsum 5,000 (resp) 5,000 (resp) 15J (PM4) 15,000 (total) 95J (PMIOO) Portlandite 5,000 5,000 (resp) 84J (PM4) 10,000 (total) 15,000 (total) 14J (PMIOO) Calcite 5,000 (resp) 5,000 (resp) lOJ (PM 4) NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
REL = recommended exposure level/limit
OSHA = Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PEL = permissible exposure limit.
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gOv/asbestos/lowermaiihattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003 NYC-WTC_000178424
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
No available related records indexed in this group.
Filed elsewhere
12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗43 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.962
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178054
Preliminary health evaluation report regarding the World Trade Center site submitted in October 2001.
8 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.961
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗14 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.959
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176156
Report enclosure detailing air and settled dust sampling results for Building 26, including PM size fraction analysis.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.958
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗20 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗9 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.956
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.955
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.998 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.968 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.968 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.956 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.956 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.956 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content