NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

Lead analysis lab report, P.S. 89M dust wipe, April 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Laboratory report from ATC Associates detailing lead concentration results for a dust wipe sample collected at P.S. 89M on April 5, 2002.

NYC-WTC_000177216
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000177216
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

ATC ASSOCIATES, INC 104 E 25th Street, 10th Floor New York, NY 10010 Tel. 212-353-8280 Fax 212-353-8306

REPORT DATE: 04-06-02

CLIENT: NYC BOE

PROJECT ADDRESS: PS89M/201 Warren Street NY, NY 10282

PROJECT NO: 41617-0562 SAMPLED BY: H. Antonyan

SAMPLE DATE: 04-05-02 DATE RECEIVED: 04-05-02 DATE ANALYZED: 04-05-02

SAMPLE MEDIA: Dust Wipe Sample ANALYSIS REQUIRED: Method EPA 3050/7420

ANALYSIS RESULTS

SAMPLE BATCH SAMPLE DESCRIPTION LEAD DETECTION ID NO. CONCENTRATION LIMIT (Pg/tf)

01 9752 Classroom #401 Window Sill <7.2 7.2

02 9752 Classroom #401 Floor <9.0 9.0

03 9752 Classrom #401 Floor <9.0 9.0 04 9752 4th Floor Hallway by Entrance of C.R.#401 Floor <9.0 9.0

05 9752 Blank <9.0 gg 9.0 gg

NOTE I: THE REPORTING LIMIT (RL) IS 18.0 gg NOTE 2: HUD Guidelines for final clearance dust wipe samples: Floor 40 pg/fP, Window sills 250 pg/ft^, Window wells 400 pg/ft/ Exterior surfaces 800 pg/fil NOTE 3: Blank units arc in pg

CONFIDENTIAL, CITY_21MC100_003471604 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER NO. 2, SEPT. 2008

NYC-WTC_000177216

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000177216Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

No available related records indexed in this group.

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →