NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

Air sampling report for mercury vapor, March 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Laboratory report from ATC Associates detailing air sampling results for mercury vapor conducted at a NYC school in March 2002.

NYC-WTC_000175674–000175675
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000175675
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Mr. Bernard ]’. Orlan March 29, 2002 Air Sampling for Mercury Vapor Page 2 Stuvvesant Hi uh School ATC Project No. 15-19125-0246

Blank-Corrected (Hg) Concentrations March 13,2002 I

Hg-1 0.290 96 0.302 **BDL 1” Floor Main Lobby HgC 0.300 96 0.312 0.104 2"'* floor bridge lobby 0.300 96 0.312 0.104 Roof Hg-4 0.290 Blank * micrograms per cubic meter of air ** Below Detection Limit

The established regulatory value for mercury (OSHA: O.lmg/m’) is intended for industrial workplace exposures and is not generally applicable to office/school settings. There are no standards for mercury in indoor air in non-industrial situations. The EPA has no standard or guideline for mercury vapor in ambient air.

ATC appreciates the opportunity to provide this indoor air quality service to the BOE. Please call me at (212) 353-8280 extension 212 if you have any questions.

Sincerely, ATC Associates, Inc.

James R. Cohn, CIH, CSP Regional Manager Industrial Hygiene Division

Attachment

CONFIDENTIAL, CITY_21MC100_003432311 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER NO. 2, SEPT. 2008

NYC-WTC_000175675

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000175675Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

No available related records indexed in this group.

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →