NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

Air sampling report for silica dust, Feb 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Letter report from ATC Associates regarding air sampling for silica-containing dust at a NYC Board of Education school in February 2002.

NYC-WTC_000175070–000175071
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000175071
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Mr. Bernard P. Orlan March 1, 2002 Air Sampling for Silica Page 2 Stuvvesant High School ATC Project No. 15-19125-0246

The amount of quartz in this sample was <22%, therefore the PEL for this dust would be:

lOmg/m^ 0.417 mg/m’ 22 + 2

The silica concentration in this sample was 3.2% of the calculated PEL,

The OSHA PEL is the only regulatory standard for silica exposure, however it is intended for occupational exposure in settings such as foundries, sandblasting, rock drilling, etc. The EPA does not have an ambient-air quality standard for silica.

Silica was not detected above the analytical limit of detection in any of the remaining samples collected on this date.

ATC appreciates the opportunity to provide this indoor air quality consultative service to the BOE. Please call me at (212) 353-8280 extension 212 if you have any questions.

Sincerely, ATC Associates, Inc.

James R. Cohn, CIH, CSP Regional Manager Industrial Hygiene Division

Attachment

CONFIDENTIAL, CITY_21MC100_003429705 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER NO. 2, SEPT. 2008

NYC-WTC_000175071

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000175071Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

No available related records indexed in this group.

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →