NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/7DCAS/Proposal for Full Comprehensive MEP Engineering Services for Forest City Tech Place Associates
Document / 127 pages

Proposal for MEP engineering services dated May 6, 1992

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Formal proposal document dated May 6, 1992, outlining MEP engineering services provided by an architectural firm.

NYC-WTC_000166571–000166697

Folder label: “Proposal for Full Comprehensive MEP Engineering Services for Forest City Tech Place Associates

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000166634
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

VI. Project Schedule TKLP Time frame for document preparation, review and approval is critical, therefore we have attached our overall schedule requirements (see attached Supplement E). Please provide a detailed schedule for the project phases to meet our requirements. Include the schedule for pre-purchase items. See the Project Schedule on the following six pages

Since this project schedule is aggressive, how do you propose to "get it right" the first time? (A solution is not required, just a brief explanation of your intended approach to this challenge.) It is our practice to develop a project production schedule that identifies tasks, drawings, and all deliverables. We also develop histograms for the staffing for the project. The schedule in­ cludes points where approvals must be reached, coordination must take place, where infor­ mation is required, and any other restraint. TKLP monitors progress based on this plan. We adjust the plan when changes take place and then run the project against the adjusted plan. Our project manager performs independent reviews of the disciplines' documents to back check their reporting on degree of completion. We issue status letters to our client monthly that indicate what has been accomplished that month against the plan, a look ahead against the plan, our present schedule status and our plan schedule status, and outstanding coordina­ tion and approved or other restraint items that could impact our schedule performance.

Scheduled internal quality control and quality assurance reviews by TKLP senior manage­ ment, and structured, timely review and approval procedures throughout the design and docu­ mentation process assures FCTPA and CDCSA that talent, energy, enthusiasm and experience will be applied efficiently and their work product checked against approved criteria.

Describe where and how your firm has solved this situation before. Be specific. All our major projects are done against a schedule plan and our record of schedule perfor­ mance is excellent. Relevant projects include; Shearson Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch at the Teleport site, and the United Airlines Apollo Reservation System.

Forest Qty Tech Place Associates for Full Engineering Services 05/06/92 [P237] Vl-l

NYC-WTC_000166634

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000166634Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →