NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/2001 M. Gilsenan
Document / 10 pages

Medical monitoring purchase order requisition, Nov 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 80%

Memo forwarding purchase order requisition number for medical monitoring services, pending second bid due to funding delays.

NYC-WTC_000164438–000164447

Folder label: “2001 M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000164444
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Erdfarb, Stuart (ex) Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:18 PM To: Smyth, Virginia Cc: Gilsenan, Michael; Fenves, Carol; Annexstein, Robin Subject: emergency contracts

1. I clearly recall advising everyone at our meeting that when BEC did the bids for the Schools, it had to be in writing and no fax. THIS IS NOT A SMALL PURCHASE. The other two Emergency contracts were done with hard-copy bids (as fas as I know), not Faxes. What made BEC think that they could solicit Fax bds for a contract that is not a small purchass?

2. What in the world was BEC thinking when it accepted a bid because it was the first received? There is no provision anywhere for such a selection criteria.

3. I am at the verge a removing all delegation which allows BEC toperform its own bid solicitation.

4.1 really need to be calmed down.

1

NYC-WTC_000164444

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000164444Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →