NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
dete.j?mined) . Kelly has suggested removing the asbestos (hence fiber
glass also) in settled dust health criteria altogether because of the
lack of established criteria, an idea which we should also consider.
I am leaning towards the use of an asbestos in air criteria (0.01 f/cc)
alone based upon a cancer risk of 1x10 (4) for a one-year exposure
duration that Mark Maddaloni proposed some time back, however, I am
completely unfamiliar with the Millette k factors - and if any settled
dust criteria at all is used, let it be based upon background levels
only.
My sense is that this will take a while to settle and that the EPA is
leaning towards using the k factors unless anyone presents a compelling
reason why they should not be used. The primary compelling reaon may be
that we might be establishing a dangerous health precedent for asbestos
in settled dust based on "experimental criteria".
Your comments/thoughts on this are welcome. It was established that
DEP needs to participate in next Monday’s call - that will be our
chance to further discuss this with the PIC group - or at this
Thursday’s meeting.
Jeanine Prud’homme
Assistant Commissioner
Office of Environmental Sciences & Engineering
Ph: (212) 295-5386
Fax: (212) 295-5428
Cell: (917) 807-2583
e-mail: [email protected]
Jeanine Prud’homme
Assistant Commissioner
Office of Environmental Sciences & Engineering
Ph: (212) 295-5386
Fax: (212) 295-5428
Cell: (917) 807-2583
e-mail: [email protected]
Jeanine Prud’homme
Assistant Commissioner
Office of Environmental Sciences & Engineering
Ph: (212) 295-5386
Fax: (212) 295-5428
Cell: (917) 807-2583
e-mail: [email protected]
2
NYC-WTC_OO0163758
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.