NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan
Document / 13 pages

EPA response letter with respirator policy revisions, August 2003

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

City law department correspondence coordinating response to EPA with proposed changes to respirator requirements and related policies.

NYC-WTC_000163200–000163212

Folder label: “E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000163201
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

[ We Strongly recommend that the respirator sections be completely taken out of this report. Work place safety and personal protective equipment are matters within the jurisdiction of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). These matters ai'e, therefore, inappropriate for assessment by EPA-QIG. Further, much of the material concerning respirators appears to be based on two reports that me inaccurate, incomplete and insufficiently researched.]

Respirator Use at Ground Zero Lacking I A widely publicized aspect of the WTC response was the lack of respirator use- less than 100% compliance with requirements to use respirators by rescue and construction crews. It was beyond the scope of this review to determine the extent that respirators were not used of noncompliance with respirator requirements and why this occurred. However, we reviewed EPA' s efforts to provide respirators, reviewed accounts of respirator use in various articles and reports, and inquired about respirator use and availability during our interviews with EPA, other Federal agencies. New York City, and non-govemmental officials. Our limited work in this area indicated that respirators were generally widely available but were not wont provisions of the Site requirements for using respirators were not fully complied with for a number of reasons. A significant factor was the desire to save lives without regard for personal safety in the immediate aftermath of the disaster. Other reasons appeared to include the respirators' interference, due to the state of the technology, with the ability of emergency workers to communicate, lack of training [not true, fit-checking and orientation began as early as 9/12/01], lack of enforcement of safety measures at the she [totally false; the City, together with OSHA and the four contractors, undertook an aggressive effort to enforce the use of all personal protective equipment (PPE), especially respirators. These efforts were extensively documented throughout the recovery mid clean-up efforts], and conflicting messages about the air quality at Ground Zero.

DRAFT EXCERPTS - FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

DRAFT EXCERPTS - FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

1

NYC-WTC_000163201

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000163201Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →