NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
attachC'^to them or very fine particles composed of unusual combinations of
silica coalesced with lead or other toxic materials."
My questions to EPA would include: What is the relationship between
particle configuration and location of exposure (indoor vs outdoor)? What
about the issue of source strength (amount of material that would have been
entrained in a typical indoor apartment)?
page 8 bottom "Limited available evidence suggest the incursion of asbestos
to the indoor environment. A small study which sampled the indoor
environment of two apartments on September 18 showed very high indoor levels
of asbestos"
There is evidence (including the DOH/ATSDR indoor study) that would indicate
that the two apartments mentioned above are outliers and do not represent
the vast majority of indoor spaces in Lower Manhattan. In any event, a
sample size of two would not be large enough to justify EPAs conclusion.
page 11 top "Difficulties associated with site access and security, power
supply sources, equipment availability and analytical capacity hindered
efforts by EPA and the NYSDEC to put air monitors in place immediately after
the attack...other contaminants were not sampled until September 23, such as
dioxin."
My experience with EPA is that the reasons given are inadequate for an
extraordinarily long delay (given events). However, I think it would be
more appropriate for OEM to respond. I have sent it to OEM and will
followup with them today.
page 33 top "They (Lioy et al) also noted that penetration of substantial
quantities of WTC-derived dust into indoor office or residential spaces
likely notably increased the potential for indoor exposures (via ingestion
or by inhalation of re-entrained particles) to high levels of constituent
elements and compounds."
What is the basis for this statement?
The document is technically rigorous and well written when documenting
outdoor exposures but includes many such statements on indoor exposures with
limited data to support them. I'm not sure we gain anything by pointing out
the uncertaintly contained within them.
>» "Cohen, Jay" <[email protected] > 04/06/03 01:36PM >»
Kelly:
Have you submitted comments on behalf of DoH concerning the EPA
draft report that we talked about? If you have, can I get a copy of them?
If you have not, are you going to submit and is there anything that I can
help with. Please e-mail or call me at (212) 676-9219 as the deadline is
April 7, 2003. Thanks.
2
NYC-WTC_000163102
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.