NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan
Document / 3 pages

Updated cost estimates for EPA oversight, June 19, 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Correspondence adjusting salary and travel budget figures for EPA oversight of cleaning contractors.

NYC-WTC_000162403–000162405

Folder label: “E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162404
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Timeline for receiving analytical results

Asbestos - 3 days from receipt of samples Metals - 5 days from receipt of samples

Calculation of .OOOgf/cc as 30 year risk value:

The IRIS inhalation unit risk for asbestos is 2.3 E-01 per f/cc. Here's how this unit risk is interpreted. Exposure over a lifetime (i.e., 70 yrs) to 1 f/cc of asbestos results in a cancer risk of 2.3 E-1. (This is an upper bound estimate- and it is based on a substantial data base of occupational cohorts.) To get the fiber concentration equating to a 1 E-04 (one-in ten thousand risk - for lifetime exposure) set up the following equation:

BWil1 1 f/cc X

X = 1 .23

X S5H4 f/cc This is the fiber concentration that equates to 1 E-04 risk for 70 yr exposure.

To adjust the exposure duration to 30 yrs, multiply SEE4 f/cc by 70 SEE 9f/cc 30

Explanation of how the lab will achieve .OOOQf/cc:

The ultimate sensitivity of the asbestos TEM analysis is based upon two factors: (1) the volume of air sampled, and (2) the area of the sample filter that is looked at with the TEM - this is referred to as number of grid openings that are scanned under the electron microscope.

in theory, the sensitivity for the TEM is extremely low, but in reality the "practical" sensitivity depends upon how much air can be drawn through a filter before the filter gets "clogged" with non asbestos particulates, and how much you willing to pay the lab to analyze a large number of grid openings (for AHERA, 10 grid openings are usually scanned).

For our needs in the WTC, we desire to reach a sensitivity of SEE9. If we were to collect 1200 liters of air (recommended by AHERA), the lab would have to scan 30 grid openings to reach the 0;SEE9. This constitutes about 3 times more laboratory effort to reach our sensitivity needs than would be needed for typical AHERA. To keep the laboratory effort at a minimum, we have recommended that 4000 liters of air be sampled. At this volume, the lab only has to read 9 grid openings to get to 0. SEB 9.

There is the possibility that we will not be able to sample 4000 liters of air in the indoor studies. Efforts at Libby have shown that the typical filter used for asbestos analysis (0.45 micron) became easily clogged in homes where the residents were smokers. In these cases, they switched over to 0.8 micron filters, and in many instances, these also became clogged. In those cases where we will not be able to sample 4000 liters, then we will either have to have the lab scan more grid openings or report a higher sensitivity. For example if we can only collect 2SEE liters, the lab will have to scan 18 grid openings to reach the 0;SEE9.

FYI: The calculation for sensitivity is

NYC-WTC_000162404

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162404Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →