NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
"Garvey, Robert" <[email protected]>,
Paul
Giardina/R2/USEPA/US@EPA, John
Girman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,
Terry Smith/DC/USEPA/USgEPA, Michael
Debonis/R2/USEPA/US@EPA,
[email protected], Herman
Gibb/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard
Salkie/R2/USEPA/US8EPA, Joe
Rotola/R2/USEPA/US@EPA,
[email protected], Paul
Simon/R2/USEPA/US@EPA, Carol
Lynes/R2/USEPA/US@EPA, John
Schaum/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Judy-Ann
Mitchell/R2/USEPA/US@EPA,
Alice Yeh/R2/USEPA/US@EPA
cc: [email protected].
[email protected], Auria
Cruz/R2/USEPA/US@EPA,
Michael Debonis/R2/USEPA/US@EPA, Virginia
Stradford/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, amo03
@health.state.ny.us.
[email protected]. Burton
Kushner/R2/USEPA/US@EPA,
"Garvey, Robert" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], janemgdep.nyc.gov.
[email protected].
[email protected], amoO3
ghealth.state.ny.us.
[email protected], John
Higgins/R2/USEPA/US@EPA, Bruce
Sprague/R2/USEPA/US@EPA,
valej [email protected]
Subject: RE: SOW Attached
If these buildings were not affected, OSHA sees no reason to require PPE
or to be concerned about any airborne contaminants.
Is boiler plate language being used?
These people are sampling in "CLEAN" apartments. All employers should
be aware of, and in compliance with, OSHA regulations. However, in this
cases, if safety and health plans are necessary, then this need must be
linked to something other than background sampling in apartments
unaffected by WTC.
---- Original Message----
From: Maltais.Nancygepamail.epa.gov
[mailto:Maltais.Nancygepamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:50 AM
To: dianacgdep.nyc.gov ; [email protected];
nj [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; nkkOlghealth.state.ny.us;
[email protected]; grevatt.peter@epamail .epa.gov;
[email protected]; [email protected]; svrlgcdc.gov;
marianne.j acksongfema.gov; habib.ninagepamail.epa.gov;
basso.raygepamail.epa.gov; pavlou.georgegepamail.epa.gov;
2
NYC-WTC_OO0162250
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.