NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Exposures Short Term vs.
Long Term
"3
Some substances have short-term irritating
effects for some peopie (e.g. particuiate
matter)
Some substances have iong -term effects,
generaliy when exposures are for relatively
long periods of time at higher levels of
exposure (e.g. asbestos)
The numerous potential substances of concern have led to some
confusion about the potential health effects of various substances.
Depending on the substance, the effects will differ. Some substances
such as the particulate matter from the dust or the smoke in the air
can be irritating but are not expected to have long term effects for
most people.
Other substances, such as asbestos, are not expected to have short
term effects. If exposures were high over long periods of time, these
substances could have long term effects.
Asbestos was one of the substances of greatest concern since it was a
known building component in the WTC. However, [REFER to EPA
maps], the levels of asbestos in the outdoor air, except for a few
transient increases found during the initial weeks, decreased after the
first month and, thus, cannot be considered long term exposures.
For other substances, once the fires have been extinguished, release of
chemicals such as benzene, dioxins and PCBs and furans will not be a
concern.
6
NYC-WTC_000153847
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.