NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
1. Invoices and Retainage
First, your Dispute alleges that there are four enumerated invoices, as well as others
categorized as “various” to be paid to your client. With respect to the “various” invoices, in
the amount of $3,447.90, a check in the amount, of $3,103.11 ($3,447.90 less the retainage
amount) dated March 22, 2004 (check no. ADOOl53987024) was sent to your client. (See
copy of FMS report attached hereto as Exhibit “1”).
With regard to the other invoices, NYCDEP has, on several occasions, advised Termon that
the majority of these funds have been approved for payment by USEPA and has asked on
several occasions for a request for the release of retainage, all of which would be included in
one payment. When the $3,447.90 is deducted from the total arriount your client claims is due
and owing, the remaining balance, according to your client, is $ 82,205.98. NYCDEP
recently learned that with respect to these invoices (011, 022, 024 and 025), USEPA has
authorized payment in the amount of $78,339.41.
By letter dated September 8, 2004 to Krish Radhakrishnan, your client has asked that future
payments be sent to you. In order to do so, your client must effectuate an Assignment of
Payment, which must include your firm’s EIN number, a vendor code and your firm’s name
and address. Further, if not already in the City’s payment system, your firm must fill out a
Substitute W-9 form to ensure that the checks are properly cut (a W-9 form is attached as
Exhibit “2”). Once NYCDEP has received an appropriate request for an Assignment of
Payment (a sample of which is attached hereto for your information as Exhibit “3” - please
note that the Assignment of Payment must be notarized and must have a place for the
Department’s stamp of consent), as well as an invoice requesting release of the retainage
amount, both will be processed, ensuring that your firm receives any and all balances due
under this Contract. In the interest of expediency, it is most likely that both the $78,339.41
and the retainage amount will be included in one check.
I have been advised that on numerous occasions, NYCDEP has asked your client to submit, in
writing, an invoice for the release of the retainage amount. As discussed above, upon receipt
of a Proper Payment Assignment and invoice for the retainage amount, a check shall be cut to
your firm, as Assignee. It should be noted that while your client claims $213,800.57 is due
and owing as retainage, NYCDEP’s figure is $214,145.06, which shall be the amount
provided.
Therefore, once all the Payment Assignment paperwork has been approved and processed,
your firm shall be receiving $214,145.06 (retainage) plus $78,339.41 (invoices), a total of
$292,484.47.
2. Cleaning of HVAC Units in Residential Apartments
With regard to the HVAC Units in Residential Apartments, the Scope of Work clearly states
that “[t]he Cleaning Contractor is responsible for cleaning residences, common spaces, and
portions of HVAC systems identified by the Monitoring Contractor.” The HVAC Systems
“determined by the Monitoring Contractor to be impacted by dust or debris” were to be
cleaned in accordance with the “site-specific scope of work” prepared and provided by the
Monitoring Contractor. While Section 3(h) does reference HVAC systems, so does Section
3(i), referencing “window and room air conditioners.” However, Termon’s reading of
NYC-WTC_000153565
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.