NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 26/No folder label
Document / 12 pages

Comments recommending removal of respirator sections from EPA report

Machine-extracted title · confidence 50%

Document arguing that respirator safety issues fall under OSHA jurisdiction and should be removed from the EPA review.

NYC-WTC_000153382–000153393
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000153393
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

characterized as sporadic. We recommend that the paragraph be revised to delete the table showing the exceedances and any reference to the table be deleted. And, also reference that two of the exceedances were near Stuyvesant High School. Reference to Stuyvesant implies that this location should be given preference over other locations near the site. The fourth sentence of the paragraph should be revised to read, “Out of approximately 40,000 samples taken from October 2001 through May 2002 there were only seven exceedances of the AHERA standard.” The seventh sentence should be revised to read, “The above information shows the virtual non­ existence of asbestos in the ambient air in publicly accessible locations at levels of concern established by EPA for the WTC response (i.e., the AHERA standard) from October 2001 to May 2002.”

20. The second full paragraph on page 20 beginning, “The indoor residential cleanup program” is inaccurate. The second sentence states that the Governor of New York did not declare a public health emergency. Although the Governor did not declare a public health emergency, he declared a “general emergency”, which is construed to include a public health emergency. Also, the fourth sentence states that the City indicated that an indoor cleanup was not necessary. This is not correct. At no time did the City indicate that an indoor cleanup was not necessary. In fact, early in the “Response Effort”, the City inquired concerning the availability of federal funds to pay for such a cleanup. The City accordingly recommends that the second sentence be modified to delete the phrase, “and the Governor of New York did not declare a public health emergency for this incident.” We recommend that the fourth sentence of the paragraph be deleted.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment concerning the revised draft report. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or my staff.

C:\Docuinents and Settings\MichaelGi\Local 6 08/04/03 2:51 PM Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK5\Revised DratCmts.doc

NYC-WTC_000153393

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000153393Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000104853 · Box DEP Box 36

Facsimile cover sheet transmitting documents regarding environmental work at 102 Greenwich Street.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

Compare copies and versions →