28 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.967
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗VOC sampling locations table for Ground Zero area, Jan 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.
NYC-WTC_000148952–000149197Folder label: “NO INFO”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
orders of magnitude below the OSHA PEL of 5*10^ ng/m\ The NIOSH REL is an 8-hr time-weighted average air concentration. It is associated with long-term or repeated exposures, and is protective of effects on the liver and the reproductive system. The OSHA PEL is also an 8-hr time-weighted average air concentration. It is associated with long-term or repeated exposures and is protective of effects on the ski (dermatitis).
Dioxins. Monitoring data indicate that dioxin toxic equivalent (TEQ) levels in air near the WTC were up to three orders ofmagnitude higher (1000 times higher) than is typicalfor urban areas in the United States. Typical levels for urban areas are 0.1 to 0.2 picograms of TEQ per cubic meter (pg TEQ/nP), while levels found in Ground Zero and near Ground Zero, starting September 23 (the date of thefirst sample taken) and continuing through late November ranged from 10 to over 150 pg TEQ/m^. Concentrations measured several blocksfrom Ground Zero were still elevated above typical urban background, but considerably lower than sites in or near ground zero, rangingfrom 1 to 10 pg TEQ/m^ during this same time period. Everywhere these elevations dropped rapidly, and the data suggest that by December 2001, levels decreased to background levels. These levels need to be considered in the context of total exposure to dioxin, 95% of which is attributed to dietary intake in normal background settings. Therefore, although inhalation exposure to dioxin at these elevated air concentrations is significantly higher than typical inhalation exposure to dioxin, an individual’s overall exposure to dioxin may not be impacted significantly. An exposure and risk screening exercise was conducted with available monitoring data, and the results suggest that these elevations did not result in a significant elevation in cancer or non-cancer risk over the background riskfor exposure to dioxin-like compounds.
The monitoring data indicate that, through late November, dioxin TEQ levels in air near the WTC were distinctly elevated compared with typical levels in urban air. An exposure and risk screening exercise based on these high concentrations suggest a temporary elevation in exposures for Ground Zero workers but very minimal impact for nearby residents and office workers. It is concluded that these potential exposures during 2001 do not constitute a public health concern. Dietary intake of dioxins is much higher than inhalation intake, and thus, the ambient concentrations of dioxin within and near Ground Zero, although considerably elevated above typical urban air concentrations of dioxin, are not as significant as suggested by the orders of magnitude in elevation indicated above.
However, much of the data obtained from within and near the WTC site are of limited interpretive value due to high detection limits. When dioxin-like compounds were not detected in an air sample, the TEQ concentration was determined by assuming that each dioxin-like compound was present in the air at one-half the detection limit for that compound. This is typical for calculating dioxin TEQ concentrations, and for other contaminants as well. Because dioxin-like compound concentrations were considerably elevated in the ambient air from September through late November 2001 within and near Ground Zero, these concentrations were able to be measured, despite high detection limits. Concentrations ranged from 10 to 150 pg TEQ/m’ during this time, which was between 100 and over 1500 times higher than typically found in urban air.
DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE 7 October 2002
NYC-WTC_000149088
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
NYC-WTC_000149537
Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
42 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.964
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000162222
EPA staff distributed an environmental laboratory report to federal and city agencies on May 15, 2002.
27 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗27 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.977
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
44 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗34 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176160
Draft assessment summarizing eight months of monitoring data regarding air, dust, and water contaminants at the WTC site and surrounding areas.
29 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000176140
Appendix document outlining health protective screening values and contaminants of concern for WTC site workers and Lower Manhattan residents.
25 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.968
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000125845
Draft fact sheet from DOH and DEP addressing tenant concerns regarding asbestos fibers at 105 Duane Street.
39 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.966
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000186193
Draft environmental data report for the World Trade Center site prepared by IT Corporation for the EPA in November 2001.
38 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.965
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗34 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.963
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000161674
Document excerpt listing counsel and staff members assigned to a paper on infrastructure related to World Trade Center recovery.
19 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.961
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000097748
Cover letter from Ambient Group Inc dated Nov 1, 2001, addressing additional environmental concerns and proposed monitoring.
Similarity score 0.957 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000097690
Fax cover sheet from Ambient Group dated November 21, 2001 regarding indoor environmental quality surveys.
Similarity score 0.955 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
Similarity score 0.945 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000141119
EPA news summary dated October 14, 2001, regarding environmental monitoring data collected from the World Trade Center site.
Similarity score 0.941 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000126257
Administrative label or header page identifying records associated with 10 Cortlandt Street.
Similarity score 0.940 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000147006
Form documenting an environmental referral for the World Trade Center site with follow-up status.
Similarity score 0.937 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Buildings in this record
Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
- 0 Barclay Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 42
- 0 Broadway · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 49
- 1 Murray Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 2
- 1 South Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 44
- 100 Trinity Place · 1 pages · confidence 0.85 · verify page 24
- 110 Liberty Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 22
- 140 Broadway · 2 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 1
- 200 Broadway · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 51
- 230 Broadway · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 50
- 250 South End Avenue · 1 pages · confidence 0.15 · verify page 85
- 290 Broadway · 19 pages · confidence 0.70 · verify page 4
- 4 Canal Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 45
- 4 Vesey Street · 1 pages · confidence 0.00 · verify page 56
Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
Review draft of an environmental health and safety plan for debris operations at Staten Island Landfill.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000150256
Table of contents for a site control plan document regarding landfill entry and exclusion zones for WTC debris.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000148192
Notice instructing staff to preserve original World Trade Center documents for potential legal actions against the City.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000148742
Notice instructing staff to preserve original World Trade Center documents for potential legal actions against the City.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer