NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 10/NO INFO
Document / 246 pages

VOC sampling locations table for Ground Zero area, Jan 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Table listing volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling sites and dates outside of Ground Zero from September 2001 to January 2002.

NYC-WTC_000148952–000149197

Folder label: “NO INFO

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000149061
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

EPA: Federal Register: Draft Exposure and Human Health Evaluation of Airborne Pollution From the Wc.. Page 3 of 3 be exposed as a result of the collapse of the towers, some information on indoor and occupational exposures is summarized in EPA's draft report. The incursion of dust and other contaminants into residences and buildings is being addressed via a number of other studies initiated in conjunction with the plans by EPA and its federal, state, and city partners to clean up residences impacted by the collapse of the World Trade Center. The draft report also includes a discussion of rodent respiratory toxicology studies, conducted by EPA scientists, that exposed mice to fallen dust samples collected at or near Ground Zero on September 12 and 13, 2001. The purpose of these studies was to evaluate the toxicity of fine particulate matter dust on the respiratory tract of mice and to compare well-studied particulate matter reference samples, ranging from essentially inert to quite toxic, to those collected at the World Trade Center site. These studies found that fine particles were dominated by calcium containing compounds derived from World Trade Center building materials, and that a high exposure to World Trade Center fine particulate matter could cause mild lung inflammation and airflow obstruction in mice. These findings suggest that a similarly high exposure in people could cause short-term respiratory effects such as Inflammation and cough. Further, it is important to note that while this ERD is undergoing public review and comment, a process of external independent expert scientific peer review also is underway. These review processes are the usual steps that EPA takes to ensure full and open participation by interested parties. These steps also help EPA identify areas where a draft document could be improved to strengthen both clarity and completeness of the draft. Comments from the public and from the expert peer reviewers will be used to improve the draft report before it is finalized. Finally, EPA scientists, in collaboration with other federal and state environmental health professionals, as well as colleagues in academia and medical institutions, will continue to analyze available data on human exposures to environmental contaminants resulting from the World Trade Center disaster. This continuing work will help us to better understand the potential human health impacts. Dated: December 20, 2002. Paul Gilman, Assistant Administrator, Office of Research and Development. [FR Doc. 02-32600 Filed 12-26-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

EPA Home | Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us

Last updated on Friday, December 27th, 2002 URL: http://www.epa.gov/EPA-TOX/2002/December/Day-27/t32600.htm

http://www.epa.gOv/EPA-TOX/2002/DeceinberZDav-27/t32600.htm no /I n/nnm NYC-WTC_000149061

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000149061Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

DEP WTC General Correspondence Form · Box DEP Box 10

NYC-WTC_000149798

Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.

35 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.960

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →