NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Roles and Responsibilities Within ERA Need to Be Delineated
EPA needs to delineate roles and responsibilities for its various programs offices
when responding to emergencies, including how these roles and responsibilities fit
within the incident command structure. Despite the commendable actions of
many EPA personnel, the Agency should outline roles and responsibilities for its
program offices beforehand to provide a more efficient and coordinated response
to future disasters.
For example, within 3 days of the disaster, EPA officials within the Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air and the Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards
had developed a web site with such captions as “Protecting Yourself from
Asbestos Exposure,” “Health Effects of Dust and Smoke,” and “Strategies for
Clean Up Inside Residences and Businesses.” However, this web site was not
activated and made available to the general public. One EPA official told us there
was an overwhelming amount of activity going on and that this information
probably “got lost in the fray.” EPA Region 2 officials could not recall why the
web site was not activated.
Also, although EPA’s National Exposure Research Laboratory team made it to
New York on September 16 to help implement an ambient monitoring network,
they were unable to gain access to the site and start monitoring until
September 21. The Laboratory’s monitoring team’s abilities were especially
needed since they had air monitoring equipment that could run on both electrical
and battery power, and they had airborne particulate matter monitors.
In its lessons learned report, EPA Region 2 recommended that the Region identify
a team of dedicated people who will respond in the event of a new crisis. In our
opinion, other EPA regions should follow Region 2’s lead and identify specific
areas of expertise that may be needed in the event of an emergency, and assemble
teams of experts that can be mobilized to quickly provide this support. These
areas may include specialized sampling techniques, exposure modeling and
assessment, and risk assessment. Also, EPA Headquarters should develop
national teams to support or augment Regional response when needed, including
guidelines for determining when a response should be elevated to a national level.
Roles and Responsibilities With Outside Agencies
Need to Be Delineated
A response to an event the size of the WTC incident requires the efforts and
coordination of numerous government organizations, including Federal, State, and
local governments. Our discussions with EPA and non-EPA officials, as well as
WTC “lessons learned” reports from other organizations, indicated that there were
overlapping and sometimes confusing roles and responsibilities for the various
responding organizations. For example, early in the response, various agencies
were conducting numerous sampling efforts. Particularly for asbestos, different
59 Report No. 2003-P-00012
NYC-WTC_000145579
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.