NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
guidelines established for the Superfund program. Based on its experience with
the WTC response and the subsequent anthrax contamination responses, EPA has
initiated various actions to improve its communication practices.
Better Communication Policies, Procedures, and Guidance Needed
Officials from EPA’s OCEMR and its successor office, the Office of Public
Affairs, in Washington, D.C., were not able to provide us with current written
policies or procedures for communicating with the public. Although not
established as official Agency communication policy, EPA’s Superfund program
has issued several guidance documents regarding risk communication. EPA’s risk
communication principles and recommended practices are contained in EPA’s
Superfund Community Involvement Handbook. This Handbook identifies the
“Seven Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication,” presented in Chapter 2. As
explained in the following, EPA’s risk communications did not consistently
adhere to the principles and guidelines discussed in its Superfund guidance.
Risk Communications Need to Acknowledge Uncertainties
EPA’s Superfund Community Involvement Handbook specifically discusses
uncertainties (“Be willing to discuss uncertainties”), and the fourth rule states:
Ifyou do not know an answer or are uncertain, acknowledge it and
respond with the answer as soon as possible. Do not hesitate to
admit mistakes or disclose risk information. Try to share more
information not less; otherwise, people may think you are hiding
something.
As detailed previously in this report, EPA’s statement that the air was safe to
breathe was not qualified (except for rescue and cleanup personnel at Ground
Zero). Further, EPA’s press releases did not discuss any of the uncertainties
associated with this statement.
Dr. Peter Sandman, founder of the Environmental Communication Research
Program at Rutgers University, provided 26 recommendations for risk
communication. These include that one should “acknowledge uncertainty” and
urged “never using the word ‘safe’ without qualifying it.”
Procedures Needed to Ensure Consistency in Communications
EPA communications after the WTC catastrophe sometimes gave conflicting
information in regard to the same issue or were inconsistent with prior Agency
positions. Specifically, information provided orally about cleaning of indoor
spaces was not consistent with the messages given in Agency press releases.
64 Report No. 2003-P-00012
NYC-WTC_000145419
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.