NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
emergency action plan should be implemented.”’^ In short, die EPA should not wait for
people to get sick before it acts, and it clearly has the authority to act under this law. An
EPA memo entided “Guidance on the Use of Section 303 of the Clean Air Act” was
issued to the Regional offices on September 15,1983, outlining these very points.’^
Although the Clean Air Act is primarily intended to address source pollution,
Section 303 illustrates that EPA has authority under several statutes to respond to the
release of hazardous materials that pose a threat to human health. Also, the Clean Air
Act is not the only governing statute. The EPA has the authority to act on indoor air
under die National Contingency Plan, and this authority is not drawn into question by the
Clean Air Act
As administrator of the NCP, the EPA has die responsibility through OSCs to
direct response efforts and coordinate all other efforts at ±e scene of a release.These
response efforts include indoor air and environments. The NCP mandates that the OSC,
among other things, collect pertinent diets about the release, the nature, amount and
location of released materials, the pathways to human exposure, and the potential impact
on human health and the environment.®’ There is no delineation between indoor and
outdoor air, particularly where there is a direat to public health. In feet, under die NCP,
the EPA is authorized to “enter any vessel, fecility, establishment or other place,
property, or location.. .and conduct, complete, operate, and maintain any response actions
authorized by CERCLA or these regulations.”®^ In other words, a response under the
NCP is not limited to outdoor air, and the EPA has specific authority to remediate indoor
environments.
Although the EPA has discretion to delegate response efforts to other agencies, all
such decisions must be made through the organizational structure of the NCP, for which
the EPA has oversight’’ Therefore, any actions taken by any agency in response to the
release of hazardous substances produced by the collapse of the World Trade Center Bill
under EPA oversight. If the City takes the lead on indoor air, the EPA is not relieved of
its responsibility in this regard.
As mentioned previously, die EPA, on its website and in public press releases, has
referred people to the New York City Department of Health (NYC DOH)
recommendations for guidance on reoccupying their homes and businesses.’^ These
“ S. Rep. No. 91-1196,91“ Cong., 2“* Sess. 36 (1970). Cited in EPA Memorandum: Guidance on the Use
of Section 303 of the Clean Air Act Edward E. Reich and Michael S. Alushin, September 15,1983.
EPA Memorandum: Guidance on the Use of Section 303 of the Clean Air Act Edward E. Reich and
Michael S. Alushin, September 15, 1983.
40 CFR 300.135(a)
” 40 CFR 300.135(c)
“ 40 CFR 300.400(d)
’’40CFR300
EPA Region 11 Press Release, “EPA and OSHA Web Sites Provide Enviromnental Monitoring Data
From World Trade Center And Surrounding Areas: Data Confirms No Significant Public Health Risks;
Rescue Crews and Nearby Residents Should Take Appropriate Precautions,” October 3,2001.
15
NYC-WTC_000144737
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.