NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 08/NADLER
Document / 44 pages

September 11 public health conference agenda, Feb 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Agenda for a conference on the public health impact of September 11, featuring presentations from EPA, OSHA, and DOH officials.

NYC-WTC_000144643–000144686

Folder label: “NADLER

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000144673
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document ' W/17/02 11:23 FAX 1C004

Today, we are calling into question the integrity of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) testing and cleanup of hazardous materials in downtown Manhattan. There is a gross disparity in how the EPA has responded to t>.e 9/11 attacks as against other Instances of hazardous materials contamination around the country. I fear that the EPA has abrogated its responsiw” / to protect public health by proclaiming lower Manhattan “safe” without comprehensive data to support that conclusion. Tne EPA has oonduoted NO tests of residential homes in New York City, even though it has done so in other eases around the country. The EPA must eliminate this disparity now. The EPA must test residential homes immediately, and if necessary, dean all contaminated areas using properly trained personnel under the strictest federal

guidelines.

In addition. I call upon the EPA National Ombudsman to expand his investigation Into the Agency’s handling of the post 9/11 attacks here In New York. This investigation must be performed independently, thoroughly and expeditiously without any obstruction. I urge Administrator Whitman not to continue her quest to dissolve the office of the Ombudsman and, in so doing, further call into question the integrity of the Agency,

/ On Septe.mber 18", Administrator Whitman said she vires “glad to reassure the people of New York,. .that their air is sate

to breathe, and tneir water is safe to drink.'' ) sincerely hope she was right However, given that the EPA has not tested inside people’s homes, despite my repeated requests fer it to do so, how could the EPA have comprehensive data to support this Claim either way? More Importantly, when the EPA was presented with test results showing elevated levels of hazardous materials in downtown apartments, it chose to do nothing.

EPA Region It officials have claimed in multiple public statements that they heve no responsibility for indoor testing and

cleaning of residences in lower Manhattan, in a November 20* Nw Venk Deity News article, Region It Counsel Walter

Mugoan said. They [the federal regulations] were never contemplated to apply to someone cleaning an apartment"

Bonnie Bellow, spokesperson fer Region II said in a recant St Louis Post-Dispsteh artltie That’e not our Job and we have rw polidBS or procedures for doing that type of testing." She also stated, “We ere not a health agency.”

However. 1 have spoken with EPA officials who dispute the accuracy of those statements. The EPA National Ombudsman, Robert Martin, confirmed for me that tfie agency is, In fact, currently doing indoor testing and removal of

hazardous materials in Herculaneum, Missouri, and has also done so in McFarland. Canfemia, and Kelleg. Idaho. 3 80^0'd 2<!Z£i£9 STS dcsazbds -s’n 6f:6T 2002-AT-Nbr

NYC-WTC_000144673

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000144673Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →