NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 39/Zone I Originals
Document / 4 pages

Permit application scope of work, WTC vicinity buildings

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Permit application defining compliance requirements and scope for asbestos cleanup near the World Trade Center.

NYC-WTC_000111063–000111066

Folder label: “Zone I Originals

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000111066
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Theodorellys, Penny From: Theodorellys, Penny Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:10 PM To: Wyatt, Lisette Subject: FW: License Agreement

-----Original Message----- From: Radhakrishnan, Krish Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:28 PM To: Theodorellys, Penny Subject: FW: License Agreement

FYI -----Original Message----- From: Sevier, Adrian 1mailto:Adrian.Sevier(äfema.aov1 Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:50 AM To: 'Pecunies, Russ' Cc: Hoffer, Mark; Avaltroni, Robert; Radhakrishnan, Krish; Theodorellys, Penny; Martinet, Mary Subject: RE: License Agreement

No. If a property owner collected insurance money which was utilized for a previous cleanup, there is no duplication with present assistance—a second cleanup. However, if they received an insurance check for cleanup and they did not do any cleanup, then FEMA would be entitled to the insurance money. In addition, if there is additional insurance money available for cleanup, we would expect that. I am in NYC more than Washington these days and you may reach me locally at 212-693-7490 with any additional questions. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Pecunies, Russ fmaiIto:russp(a)dep.nvc.c1ovl Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:30 To: '[email protected]; '[email protected]' Cc: Hoffer, Mark; Avaltroni, Robert; Radhakrishnan, Krish; Theodorellys, Penny Subject: License Agreement

I left messages with both of you this morning concerning the License Agreement for Building Exterior Cleaning in Lower Manhattan. The first batch of License Agreements has gone out and so far the main question we have been getting from building owners is related to the language that FEMA had required related to reimbursement of insurance proceeds. Many building owners expended funds on cleaning the outsides of their buildings last year after the collapse of the WTC. They are now calling to find out if they are expected to reimburse FEMA for the amount that they have already spent. For example, if I'm a building owner and I paid $10,000 last year to a contractor to clean the outside of my building (which was reimbursed by insurance), and my building still has residue on it, will I have to pay FEMA $10,000 if I sign the License Agreement to let the City clean my building? This appears to be a major sticking point for a lot of building owners and we need an interpretation from FEMA ASAP. Please advise. Russell Pecunies

NYC-WTC-000111066

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000111066Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →